I don’t watch TV. Well, occasionally The Amazing Race on my snowy, cable-less screen, and for a while there Everybody Loves Raymond, but that’s it.
Has TV writing improved in recent years? Apparently: West Wing, 24 and Heroes, and maybe Lost. I know this from the twittering of those who declare their everlasting love for television. Workplace chitchat has elevated a notch or two, hinting at higher-quality idiot box fare. Still, not for me: with a family to play with, a house to fix and a book to write, I don’t have the time.
So it says a lot that the new Battlestar Galactica hooked me.
Out of nostalgic curiosity I rented Sci Fi Channel’s three-hour miniseries, and got sucked straight in by emotions that evoked the horror of 9/11. The campy cheese of the 1980’s series has been replaced by a gritty portrayal of a too-flawed humanity struggling against the calculated perfection of its own robotic offspring. Humans, who worship a pantheon of gods with icons and incense, use every break from fighting cylons to fight themselves; cylons, who have evolved to look human, worship a single transcendent God with missionary zeal and live forever by downloading their consciousness upon death. Who would you give the better odds?
When the first season began I had a problem: no cable. Geek that I was, I schlepped myself over to my mother-in-law’s house every Friday evening, and didn’t miss a single episode. Then Apple’s iTunes store picked up the show, and with some mental math I realized $1.99 per episode wasn’t much more than the gas it took to drive to mother-in-law’s. Every installment since iTunes’ first offer now sits on my hard drive.
Yes, I thrilled when Time named Galactica 2006 TV Show of the Year. No one else I knew watched it, so I couldn’t participate in watercooler recaps – but at least Time confirmed I wasn’t crazy. The show’s writers were crafting something intelligent, something gripping and edgy – so much so that at the beginning of season three I broke one of my self-imposed blogging rules to write my only-ever entertainment review.
Suffice to say, the show’s writers impressed me.
And suddenly they didn’t.
Of course, all along some episodes were better than others, and a few story arcs made awkward turns. As a TV newbie I figured such frustrations were the plight of any show’s fans, akin to the ups and downs of rooting for a sports team.
But after the latest episode, I’m done. Which surprises me – I’ve never enjoyed a TV show as much, and certainly never paid $1.99 a week for one.
But that’s it. Finito.
Maybe it’s just me. Maybe I’m busier now, and so have less patience for even an hour spent poorly. Still, the writers’ accumulated missteps are dragging Galactica back into 1980’s cheese. Consider these broken rules of writing:
*** spoilers below ***
1. Actions must have consequences. But Helo, the officer in love with cylon Sharon, never faces consequences for his. In his new career of defending cylons he has 1) murdered another officer, 2) thwarted a biological attack that would have saved humanity from the cylon threat forever, and 3) sent Sharon into cylon hands to retrieve their child, even though she could have been tortured for her intelligence. Upon each incident Admiral Adama has not only shrugged, but actively shielded him from repercussions (in one case provoking a civil war to do so). Worse, for a person whose decisions continually keep humanity at risk, Helo’s one of the flattest characters on the show — zero backstory, zero character flaws.
2. Keep the plot fresh. Yet Galactica repeats itself: humans land on Planet X, cylons arrive, humans are trapped. Not only has this cycle recurred three times in only two and a half seasons, each time it has been used as a cliffhanger either between seasons, or during a mid-season siesta: “Wait and see how they get off the planet this time!”
3. Don’t preach. Originally, cylons operated in smooth accord; now every episode shows them bickering, fighting, even killing each other. Get it? They’re just like us, get it? Here’s another example! Sorry, but I’m not interested in a perpetual “Cylons Are People Too” sermon (along with the strict materialistic philosophy it implies), especially as it’s a departure from the show’s original thrust, as well as the very threat that made cylons so coldly fearsome in the first place.
4. Be consistent with your own character development. “Cylon psychology is based on projection.” So says Caprica Six to Baltar, fueling suspense over whether he himself is a cylon. Yet in no other episode do cylons mention or even exhibit projection as an aspect of their psychology. This is worse than oversight, since the show now delves full-tilt into cylon culture and religion. “Projection” was just a throw-away line to make Baltar suspect himself; cylon psychology isn’t “based” on it at all.
5. Don’t congratulate yourself on what a great story you’re telling. First we met four known cylons; gradually others were revealed, giving us seven. From the initial mini-series we know there are twelve models in all, a suspense point keeping viewers wondering who else might be a sleeper cylon – but the writers have dragged out this tease in a long dry spell with zero reveals. Now we learn the final five are, in fact, “the Final Five” – a mysterious set of models unknown even to cylons themselves, so holy that prying into their identity is sacrosanct. This late concept is an arbitrary tack-on, apparently added so the writers could imprison Baltar on a base star without revealing the final secret cylons. It could just as easily have been the final four, or six, or whatever other number the writers had happened to conceal until they repackaged them as a grand lump mystery. Worse, it functions as a self-congratulatory move: writers celebrating with religious enthusiasm the build-up of their own suspense questions.
6. Don’t abuse suspension of disbelief. Humans and cylons skeedaddle away from Planet X when the local star goes supernova. Coincidence? Unacceptably so — even though the writers embrace it as deliberate theme development through a quick line of dialogue: “I can’t get my head around these odds. That human and cylon both converge on this planet at this exact moment, just as the star is going supernova.” The implication is that either humanity’s gods or the cylons’ God has orchestrated this moment (both, really, since the writers will eventually reveal them to be the same). But I don’t care about a show that invents deities who actually move the plot. It’s enough that humans believe in gods and that cylons believe in a God, and that each race finds signs along the way seeming to confirm their beliefs. Fine. The movie Troy walked this line expertly, hinting at gods while allowing humans to work out their own destinies. But writers renege on viewers’ suspension of disbelief when they create gods who steer the plot directly. Certainly the supernova’s timing can be explained in no other way – unless it’s truly meant as a coincidence, in which case I must recite one of my school system’s standards for reading materials: plots must be “well-constructed with logical development and a minimum of coincidence.”
7. Too much of a good thing is too much. Starbuck is a wonderfully dimensional character, both macho and frail, religious and irreverent. Now the writers hint that she’s even more – a cylon perhaps, or a prophetess, or even a god. But any more mileage out of this rough-n-ready fighter pilot will stretch her beyond her already exaggerated status. Simultaneously a drunkard hotshot, a sultry sex diva, a spiritual devotee and a military strategist, Starbuck is now, as a cylon has told her and as events have confirmed, “destined” – for what? Overuse, eclipsing both other characters and believability.
8. Story should drive the plot, not budget. Seven cylons – yet we regularly see just five. President Roslyn’s aides – one killed for no good reason in a tangential episode, the other frequently absent. Someone’s skimping on the casting, writing episodes not only with the fewest possible characters (a crafty budgeting strategy), but with too few, leaving out those previously established by the series. Plot should not be dictated by casting. If actors aren’t available for filming, either pay them more to convince them to be available, or replace them with other actors. Consistent faces aren’t as important as a consistent storyline. When four cylons yell at a fifth that they’re all in agreement against her, viewers shouldn’t be wondering why, sans explanation, two of them aren’t there.
*** end spoilers ***
So that’s it for me: the crescendo of missteps has grown too loud, drowning out the story. If I didn’t have to drive elsewhere to watch Galactica, or pay $1.99 to download each episode, I’d probably continue. Free is, after all, free. But with so many writing gaffes, Galactica’s no longer worth the cost.
I suppose most TV fans come to points like this, when they’re fed up even with their favorite shows. Again, it must be like sports fans, who weather losing seasons and become disgusted with players and coaches. Thus my foray into televisionhood is complete: with Galactica I’ve experienced many highs, and now come full circle to the lows.
Someone point me to the nearest airlock, please. No, I don’t care if there’s a planet nearby, or another ship — I’m ready to disembark now.
UPDATE (January 2009): I’m surprised Moore fessed this up. Apparently he considers it a brilliant plot design instead of a cover-up afterthought.
the forester, January 2007:
|
Battlestar Galactica creator Ronald D. Moore, in a January 2009 interview:
|
January 25, 2007 at 12:11 pm |
In this post I accomplish two things: proving I’m a bigger geek than anyone suspected, and breaking another self-imposed blogging rule (writing only about things that matter). Oh well. I know a thing or two about good writing, and am very sad to see Galactica losing it.
January 25, 2007 at 12:41 pm |
You have exposed the writers of BSG! It turns out they are making all of this stuff up! I like you, thought they based this all on researched events before the show began airing (cylon models, etc.) Can you believe the nerve of these scifi writers?
I totally agree with you, characters like Starbuck should not be able to change over time! We want them to stay exactly the same throught the series! I don’t want to discover any more mysteries, when will they learn that we want the same thing – week after week!
They should also drop all this talk about God and gods. Don’t they know you can’t mix scifi with religion on TV? Dialogue on religion is the last thing we need. Again, stop trying to rock the boat!
The only thing I disagree with you on is Helo. Clearly, he needs to have his own spinoff series. I can’t imagine why the brass at scifi wouldn’t greenlight this – it would be ratings GOLD!
January 25, 2007 at 12:59 pm |
Of course you’re being sarcastic! Still, I don’t think you quite understood my points — yours seem to indicate that storytellers can’t be criticized. Certainly you’d agree that some writing’s effective, some isn’t. Yes?
Neither here nor there — as I said above, none of this matters. Thanks for chiming in.
January 25, 2007 at 3:34 pm |
HBO was near the brink of destruction until its savior the “Soprano’s” was aired. This show not only saved HBO, but turned it very profitable. So HBO stuck with the format and instead of relying on movies to lure subscribers they now rely on hit series such as The Wire, Six Feet Under, Rome, Deadwood, Carnivale, and many others. these series do not follow the typical T.V. format having the “good” guy and the “bad” guy, they have very complex and changing characters as well as story lines.
So the other networks have caught on to HBO’s success and are now trying to follow suite. Of course they don’t quite get it and have trouble adapting to the HBO format, these new network show are still much better than the ones of old.
I do not watch much of these new network shows, but I am addicted to almost all of the HBO origional series.
March 22, 2007 at 6:29 pm |
1. Actions must have consequences. – This show is full of consequences. This is completely short sighted and targeted towards Helo. Im sorry you think he’s a plot problem. I think he’s well developed and essential. As I think he’s done the right thing every time. And Adama knew that.
2. Keep the plot fresh. – Its space. Theres only space. and Planets. Two choices. That means a lot of planet action. This is not repetitive. Unless you mean running from cyclons. But thats the the show. Deal.
3. Don’t preach. – This is depth. Its gotten deeper. They arent robots. They are living organisms. Evolving. Just like we are machines. They are like us. And im sorry you dont appreciate that plot element, but theres nothing wrong with it. Talk to me when its your show.
4. Be consistent with your own character development. – I dont recall this part. Was this the cyclon in his head, in which it doesnt matter what it said, he’s talking to himself. If its a real cyclon then I think you’re taking the whole thing a little too rigidly. Like youre looking for something wrong, in that case youll find it, even if you have to bend reality. Reality contradicts itself all the time, why cant a tv show do the same?
5. Don’t congratulate yourself on what a great story you’re telling. – Now youre just getting whiney. Here are the facts. There are 12. We know of 7. And from that, you get lazy bad writers?
6. Don’t abuse suspension of disbelief. – Im having trouble responding to this. Youve outlined it all. But you have the biased hatred. Its not a coincidence. They are looking for the same thing, and some kind of spiritual force is guiding them both.
7. Too much of a good thing is too much. – Now she’s dead. So I think its evened out. Its okay for characters to change, especially after what she’s been through.
8. Story should drive the plot, not budget. – Wow, not enough presidential aids, Who says all 7 cyclons have to make every decision? WHy not 5? And why does that have to be explained? I think a big writing rule is dont overly explain everything. And a critiquing rule is not to expect it.
I think you just hate the show, hell all shows, and once you hate a show, its really easy to find things to complain about. Hell I can give you a list of plot holes and bad character developement in my life. Luckily TV shows substitute reality for fiction.
And luckily we arent all writers to pick apart what would otherwise be a perfect show.
March 22, 2007 at 6:46 pm |
Well, Jonathan, of course I disagree with you, which is why I took the time to write the original post in the first place.
But as far as my “just hating the show” — you must have missed my analysis of how BSG paralleled the American occupation of Iraq. I wrote it before season three broke too many rules.
But this is a great line from you:
Yes, truth is stranger than fiction. Maybe it needs to be. Maybe, when fiction becomes stranger than truth, it’s no longer worth paying attention to — because it has begun to lose any connection with reality.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
March 22, 2007 at 7:57 pm |
#8
I listen to the podcast commentary to almost all episodes, and although it seems that “Billy”, the president’s Aide died for no real reason, and out of the blue, it turns out that the actor (Paul Campbell) was starting to get offers for better roles outside of BG, so they opted to let him go in the most heroic way the could in the short amount of time they had.
Now it seems that they’re killing off their characters willy nilly. Give the viewer just enough time to become emotionally invested, then kill them off for “drama”, so I agree with you, but I disagree with your example. There was a reason, just not a reason the fits the story arc. Such is the life of TV production.
March 26, 2007 at 7:30 am |
First, about Helo. The precedent was already set with Apollo getting away with whatever he wanted and never being held accountable.
but they jumped the shark many times in this series, it just took more issues for some people than others
March 29, 2007 at 12:31 am |
Hi.
I really thought that the points you made were cogent and valid. I am still a fan of the show, and will continue to watch it- but certainly much of what they are doing now is leaving me with the impression that the narrative is under the strain of its own weight. The incessant charge of the likely-by-now-exhausted writers to keep up the same level of intensity is perhaps the cause for the labored quality of some of the plot devices and revelations that have made it into the third season.
Also without cable and ignorant of the other ‘popular’ series airing at the moment, I’ve been enjoying BSG since my friend imposed the dvd’s on me. I was surprised at first out how gritty and realistic-of-atmosphere it was after some exposure to Star Trek, to which it really doesn’t compare. I think that the stylistic devices (integration of music, atmosphere, use of color, etc) are employed with virtuosity and really do distinguish this denizen of the “idiot box” as art.
In the end though, it is a story. And it does sort of seem like they’re rushing through some things at this point. But so far I haven’t watched a one which I didn’t enjoy.
Cheers,
Dan
June 12, 2007 at 9:39 am |
Hey Forester,
I agree enthusiastically with all of your points, but not about their importance — yes, the ‘rules’ have been broken, but it’s not enough to make me stop watching.
#1 about Helo is especially obvious, but he’s not the only one. As another commenter notes, there’s also Apollo, and there’s also Starbuck, Tighe, Rosslyn… — maybe that’s the point. When the stakes are so high (survival of humanity), and supply of qualified humans is so low, they can’t afford to be keeping their best & brightest in lockup.
Also I think you make a great point that Starbuck’s character is too weighed down with roles. I also think she could use a little redemption, as her constant negativity (anger, rebellion, …) is getting tiring. Maybe that’s coming up. (Although it was refreshing to see her respond better to Adama’s rebuke about poisoning morale than Tighe did)
June 12, 2007 at 11:03 am |
This is the single issue that killed BSG for me (quoting from above, with new emphasis): “Sorry, but I’m not interested in a perpetual ‘Cylons Are People Too’ sermon (along with the strict materialistic philosophy it implies), especially as it’s a departure from the show’s original thrust, as well as the very threat that made cylons so fearsome in the first place.”
I found the original themes captivating. I was intrigued by the original enemy. What’s being splayed out on the screen now I find tiresome and old.
But you are certainly welcome to continue watching and enjoying. Let me know if humanity ever gets the thrashing it deserves. (I’ve argued elsewhere that the only way to bring back the show’s high stakes is a Cylon nuclear attack that decimates the fleet to a fraction of its current population.)
June 12, 2007 at 12:48 pm |
Wow — I missed that sentence my first read through (I guess you could sense that?). Here’s my best re-emphasis: “a perpetual ‘Cylons Are People Too’ sermon (along with the strict materialistic philosophy it implies)” !! Materialist philosophy is right! Although I don’t know that BSG is pushing that view unilaterally. From the Cylon’s viewpoint, they experientially feel that they are persons. But Rosslyn is often quite surprising in her assertions that the Cylons are absolutely not people, and she has no regard for Cylon ‘life’ (and the writers don’t countermand her view with any ‘punishment’, and so tacitly endorse it as at least possibly correct)
June 12, 2007 at 1:09 pm |
An excellent point. Indeed, that was one of the things I respected most about her character. It’s good to keep that pole in tension with its opposite, and so a character like Helo (with his connection to Sharon) is necessary. But I saw Helo increasingly used as the “correct” view, with Roslyn only used as a foil for him, not vice versa.
How much better the show would have been had the writers chosen a non-predetermined seesaw effect — allowing both Helo and Adama/Roslyn to take turns being plotfully “punished” as incorrect. Then I might have continued watching, just to see which way the writers would finally steer the ship.
January 20, 2009 at 7:09 am |
Read the striking update to this post here.
January 20, 2009 at 11:45 am |
Good call — although it would seem that the number five could not be completely arbitrary. In the very beginning, we know there are 12 models, and we meet them one by one. When we have seen n models, then the myth can only be about The Final 12-n
So does this mean you’re watching again? I thought the point of this post originally was that you gave up. Or maybe you jumped back on when episodes became available for free online watching?
To the point, I think Ellen is a very odd choice for the Final Fifth. She’s just so peripheral. And now they’ve got their work cut out for them to explain Starbuck.
January 20, 2009 at 2:03 pm |
Yes yes, but I still take exception to the fact that n was arbitrary, based only on how many cylons remained unrevealed up to the point it became convenient and cool for Baltar to spend time on a basestar.
Why do the cylons even use the term Final Five? They experienced no gradual series of reveals. Moreover, since they shun prying into hidden identities, they should have no expectation of any final reveals. The cylons would instead refer to them as the Unknown Five, the Secret Five. If anything, Final Five is the writers’ mental jargon popping out of cylon mouths, where it doesn’t belong.
Thou hast said it. As I mentioned in the original post, free is, after all, free.
So are Samuel Anders and Tory Foster. To start, neither Ellen nor Anders were expected to survive the nuclear holocaust. Anders is in the fleet only because of Starbuck’s religious/hallucinogenic-inspired trip back to their homeworld. The surprise of Ellen’s survival and presence in the fleet was used by the writers as a plot curveball in an earlier season. So we’re to believe that the cylons, who knew their Holy Five lived among humans, were content obliterating those same five in a deluge of nuclear explosions? I don’t buy it.
Foster wasn’t even a cast member until season two or three. Granted, we can suppose her cylon nature gravitated her toward power until she became Roslin’s right hand person. But we simultaneously can’t help but recognize that the writers had no plan, at the beginning, for who the cylons would be. (If dead Ellen is a cylon, couldn’t they have made Billy a cylon, and brought him back? It’s not as though he’s busy: his recent show, the new Knight Rider, has been canceled.)
And not much time to explain it in: this last half of season four is all they’ve got (Galactica is being dropped). I’m sure they’ve got it all worked out and intend a fun ride forward. My fear, though, is that Starbuck will turn out to be a god, who in turn will be the cylon God.
Which brings us back to point 7 above: Too much of a good thing is too much. Only three suspense questions remain. Will the human/cylon alliance find a home? Will they escape Cavil and the remaining cylon fleet? And who or what is Starbuck? One out of three is a lot of show to hang on one already overdrawn character.
February 15, 2009 at 11:58 am |
Then again, maybe not. After watching the recent mutiny episodes (Adama the insulted power junkie, Roslin the crazed vindictive delusionary), and now reading a plot summary of the latest, I realize that “free” isn’t totally void of cost. I’ll never get these clumps of 45 minutes back. So money or no money, I’m done squandering life.
Besides, I have a feeling the writers sat me in front of the firing squad with Gaeta. Fair enough — I’m sure in their minds I deserve it!
Drop me a line to tell me how the series ends …
February 16, 2009 at 12:02 am |
Ouch! Dude, you’re harshin’ my buzz!