two powerful witnesses against abortion

How do pro-choice advocates account for the fact that the two women who won abortion rights victories in 1973 are now seeking to have those Supreme Court rulings overturned?

CNN: Court won’t rethink ‘Mary Doe’ abortion case

The Supreme Court rejected an appeal Tuesday from a Georgia woman seeking to reverse a 1973 Supreme Court ruling giving her the right to an abortion.

Sandra Cano was part of the original series of landmark rulings from the high court legalizing the medical procedure. The justices without comment refused to reopen the case.

ignorance defends the status quo

What do you do when new information threatens to rock the boat? Feign ignorance!

This tactic has been employed to great success by evolutionists, who would rather claim information is still coming in than admit the fossil record holds no evidence of transitional forms between species.

Now it’s being used by abortionists, who would rather claim research is inconclusive than suggest a fetus might feel pain:

the woman who shouldn’t have happened

Gianna Jessen had lived in her mother’s womb seven months when her mother decided to kill her. An abortion doctor administered a saline solution to Ms. Jessen, who describes it this way: “The saline solution injected into the mother is to burn the baby, which gulps it in the womb. But after being literally burned alive for 18 hours I was delivered live.”

Ms. Jessen now campaigns against a woman’s right to choose. As she points out, “My mother was making a decision that was ‘only hers to make’, but I bear the scars of that”:

killing causes mental legacy

New research indicates that women who kill their unborn children can face “five years of mental anguish, anxiety, guilt and even shame.� A recent tactic by pro-abortion forces has been to refer to abortion and miscarriage in the same sentence, as if the two are equivalent. But this study reveals that they cause quite different emotional responses in women:

suffering the children

Something seems to be missing from the dialogue in this article — a sense that children belong in the public sphere, because they are just as much a part of humanity as adults:

stem cells hyped

Looks like the scientific community, ever eager to charge forward, isn’t being straight with us about the promise of stem cells:

a stem cell solution we can all live with

Thank God someone is seeking a way to avoid destroying embryos for stem-cell research, rather than plowing forward heedlessly:

toddlers that terrify

Once frozen embryos, now full flesh-and-blood children — those innocent young faces must strike terror into stem-cell research proponents. Embryo adoption is bringing to the forefront, in heart and emotion, exactly what stem cell researchers want you to forget:

admirable motherhood

An octopus makes worldwide headlines by caring heroically for her unborn children: